The Twenty-First Judicial District Commission on
Judicial Performance unanimously recommends that Judge Thomas Michael
Deister BE RETAINED.
Surveys of hundreds of attorneys and non-attorneys, who had knowledge
of Judge Deister, were conducted. In responses to those surveys,
Judge Deister rated very high in virtually every category, and,
in the majority of the categories, higher than other County Court
judges and other trial judges rated. Ninety-two percent of attorneys
and 91% of non-attorneys, who responded to the surveys, recommended
that Judge Deister be retained in office.
The most consistent comments made about Judge Deister, by both
attorneys and non-attorneys, were that he was professional. He was
seen as a judge who maintained an appropriate demeanor in his courtroom,
while remaining fair. He was frequently referred to as a very good
or excellent judge. His one weakness appeared to be a perception
that he sometimes becomes irritated, especially with lack of punctuality.
Judge Deister is aware that he can lose patience with individuals
who are not on time and works to ensure that he handles these situations
in a professional manner.
Judge Deister has served as a County Court Judge for nine years.
Prior to being appointed to the bench, he had a wide range of legal
experience in both the public and private sector. His past experiences
appear to have prepared him well for the immense case load that
he faces each day. The Commission found Judge Deister to be a judge
who recognizes the impact that he makes on the lives of those who
appear in his Court, as well as those in the community at large.
He endeavors to maintain a respect for the judicial system, while
understanding the concern and needs of those who appeared before
him. Judge Deister is especially dedicated to making a positive
impact on the lives of the young persons who find themselves in
the court system.
The Commission found Judge Deister to be a hard working, dedicated
and a compassionate judge. His respect for the judicial system is
evident, as is his outstanding character. He was seen by those who
were surveyed, as well as members of the commission, as a great
asset to the judicial system in Mesa County. |